https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 7:56 AM
    i was simply looking for a way to specify jvm options (specifically 
    -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore
    ) for the bootstrap of ivy
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 7:58 AM
    aaaaand that would either mean making the bootstrap mix in IcyTaskMixin…
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 7:58 AM
    or i guess, make those options only configurable in the ‘ivy’ scope? and not customizable per task?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 7:59 AM
    so part of the bootstrap process actually uses a known ivy version to fetch a customizable version
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:00 AM
    Copy code
    --resolve-ivy-jvm-options=<option>... (--resolve-ivy-jvm-options=<option>...) ... (default: ['-Xmx1g','-XX:MaxPermSize=256m’])
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:00 AM
    is that not exactly what you want?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:01 AM
    it isnt
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:01 AM
    those dont get applied to the part of the bootstrap phase
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:01 AM
    that uses the known/bootstrap version of ivy
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:02 AM
    whats the task you’re targeting?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:03 AM
    ivy-bootstrap?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:03 AM
    is that a “task"
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:03 AM
    seems to me that you could just add an ‘extra-jvm-options’ to 
    IvySubsystem
    and thread that to the 
    Bootstrapper
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:04 AM
    yeah i think so too
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:04 AM
    but
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:04 AM
    is that going to clobber the other options...
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:04 AM
    because resolve.ivy uses the subsystem too right?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:05 AM
    unless java options work like… last one wins or something and then we can just concatenate them all
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:06 AM
    presumably you could find some way to frame this up as an additive set of options that could just be concatenated onto the end of whats there now?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:06 AM
    yeah it might even do that
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:06 AM
    already
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:07 AM
    since i think that is how the http proxy stuff works
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:07 AM
    so if one was to have the same jvm option set in both the “ivy” (subsystem) scope and the “resolve.ivy” scope, it would be repeated in the command?
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:08 AM
    (the command for resolve.ivy, not the bootstrap one)
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:08 AM
    depends entirely on the backing impl and how it threads the options
  • g

    gentle-potato-32845

    03/08/2016, 8:08 AM
    oh i thought you were suggesting that be the implementation
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:10 AM
    well, its possible - but I was suggesting extending the 
    IvySubsystem.extra_jvm_options()
    method with a new option on the 
    IvySubsystem
    scope.
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:10 AM
    currently that seems to generate the options
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    03/08/2016, 8:10 AM
    vs any sort of subsystem specific passthru that I can find
  • c

    curved-manchester-66006

    03/08/2016, 1:49 PM
    Would a slack admin mind enabling the IRC gateway for this team?
1...104110421043...2420Latest