#development
- w
witty-crayon-22786
05/24/2017, 5:37 PM(now that we're doing per-platform builds, pex-everywhere might actually be a logical step at some point) - r
rough-minister-58256
05/24/2017, 5:37 PMyeah, agreed - r
rough-minister-58256
05/24/2017, 5:38 PMtho I expect some controversy around development modes etc - r
rough-minister-58256
05/24/2017, 5:38 PMbut the current thinking is to just lower a PEX_MODULE-alike thing into pants itself to ensure we can reinvoke in any environment for now - w
witty-crayon-22786
05/24/2017, 5:39 PMi can imagine some oddity with people's scripts. but there are probably enough cases of `subproc`ing pants that it would work. - r
rough-minister-58256
05/24/2017, 5:39 PMwell, it’d be re-exec’ing against e.g.
which issys.argv[0]
for srcmode and'/Users/kwilson/dev/pants/src/python/pants/bin/pants_exe.py'
for pex mode.'/Users/kwilson/.cache/pants/pex/bin/pants.pex/1.3.0.dev15-tw3/pants.pex' - r
rough-minister-58256
05/24/2017, 5:40 PMI guess it’s possible the wrapper script does some kind of setup we’d need to carry forward, but we could probably just clone the runtime env etc - r
rough-minister-58256
06/01/2017, 5:30 PMlooks like bazel might be beating us to the punch with a public remoting API - r
rough-minister-58256
06/01/2017, 5:30 PMCopy codeRemote Execution API We fixed a number of bugs in the Remote Execution implementation. The final RPC API design has been sent to bazel-discuss@ for discussion (see Design Document: Remote Execution API) and it should be finalized in the 0.6.0 release. The final API should only be a minor change compared to the implementation in this 0.5.0 release. - r
rough-minister-58256
06/01/2017, 5:30 PM - s
salmon-summer-38098
06/01/2017, 5:31 PMHmmm.. interesting - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/02/2017, 9:55 AMoof. looks pretty familiar. - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/02/2017, 10:59 AMback in existential crisis mode. - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/02/2017, 11:57 AMplenty of thoughts. but one of them is whether we should consider having scoot expose precisely that API, such that pants can consume anything from the bazel remoting ecosystem👍 1 - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/02/2017, 11:58 AM(there is of course also the "abandon all hope and start migrating" thought as well) - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/02/2017, 12:03 PMbut they've come up with almost exactly the same model, with the exception of explicit directory modeling (which probably makes snapshot composition easier, frankly) - r
rough-minister-58256
06/02/2017, 4:50 PMheh - h
happy-kitchen-89482
06/02/2017, 6:22 PMHas this lit a fire under you engine folks? 😉 - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/05/2017, 5:23 PMsomething like that - r
rough-minister-58256
06/06/2017, 12:24 AMyou could say that.. our pants are on fire🙄 2🔥 1👖 1 - h
happy-kitchen-89482
06/06/2017, 11:30 PMWell, the rest of the pants community awaits the results of this fire 🙂 - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/06/2017, 11:35 PM@happy-kitchen-89482 : yea, @salmon-summer-38098 is working on something. i think we'll try to schedule a call with the committers to talk strategy. - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/06/2017, 11:35 PMsoonish - s
salmon-summer-38098
06/06/2017, 11:39 PMYeah within the next 2-3 weeks for sure - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 5:46 PMoh my: struct field reordering is on: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2017/06/08/Rust-1.18.html - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 5:46 PM - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 7:49 PM@rough-minister-58256 : mmm... sameer just gave me an idea for remoting visualization - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 7:50 PMCopy codeAlso, is there a way that you can generate a graph of the timeline of a given simulated run? (Similar to the Network tab in Chrome Developer Console) - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 7:50 PMtake that, flip it vertically - w
witty-crayon-22786
06/08/2017, 7:51 PM100 column width lets you display 50 or 100 in progress tasks (depending on width/spacing)