https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#development
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    12/30/2015, 8:57 PM
    Yeah, this weekend!
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    12/30/2015, 8:57 PM
    thx
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    12/30/2015, 8:57 PM
    I just wrote a custom classloader and now I need to deploy it to something so I can watch it all burn
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    12/30/2015, 8:57 PM
    heh
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    01/04/2016, 7:18 PM
    Sorry, I did not get to the engine CR this weekend (obviously) due to forgetting, laziness, and tiredness. I'll make a point of looking at it tonight or tomorrow
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/04/2016, 7:20 PM
    my current tack is to try and lean very far in on the "declare product requirements" tack, and to attempt to make planners go away entirely by declaring all requirements up front
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/04/2016, 7:20 PM
    ...which is where r3245 began to head.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/12/2016, 12:30 AM
    i have a preview of https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/2782 ready, in case anyone wants to see it before it's passing all the tests
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:18 PM
    @witty-crayon-22786: re the conversation in #C046T6T9U - I’d love a new-engine-for-dummies with some BUILD file examples, but I know that’s not a fair request...
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:18 PM
    @happy-kitchen-89482: already exists in that review!
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:18 PM
    Huh, missed it
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:18 PM
    will look again
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:18 PM
    the only awkward bit is that 
    configuration
    is still a parameter to target
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:19 PM
    i think that, ideally, it would be possible to do 
    target(name='xyz', *configurations)
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:19 PM
    ...and just have them be a repeated list
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:19 PM
    then the syntax would be approximately:
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:21 PM
    target(name='simple', java(files='Simple.java', dependencies=['3rdparty/jvm:guava', ..]))
    (for tests/python/pants_test/engine/exp/examples/scheduler_inputs/src/java/codegen/simple/BLD.json)
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:23 PM
    one of the primary reasons i've pushed in this direction is that something like the following becomes possible:
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:23 PM
    So a target is literally just a name?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:23 PM
    target(name='simple', java())
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:24 PM
    (^ with sources and dependencies inferred)
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:24 PM
    so why even 
    java()
    ?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:24 PM
    yea, a target is just a name, although john added the ability to have targets inherit configuration from one another
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:24 PM
    Can that not also be inferred?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:24 PM
    @happy-kitchen-89482: nope... because resources
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:25 PM
    and because go code with embedded c code
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    01/13/2016, 9:25 PM
    etc
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:25 PM
    Well sure, it can’t always be inferred
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:25 PM
    but in the common case of a dir with only *.java files in it
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    01/13/2016, 9:25 PM
    ?
1...181920...906Latest